Review of BM Association Mapping v2
Acquisition patterns (Transfer of Ownership and Change of Custody) connect both the main event and the sub-event to the object:
Why do you use P24 to connect the sub-event, instead of P24i that is used for the event?
This is a nitpicking since OWLIM infers P24i from P24, but for consistency and better interoperation with repos that don't infer inverses, it's better to use P24i in both cases.
Production patterns don't connect the sub-event to the object:
<obj> P108i_was_produced_by <obj/production>.
<obj/production> P9_consists_of <obj/production/M>.
<obj/production/M> P14_carried_out_by <person>. # P108i is missing
This is inconsistent with Acquisition, and makes it harder for us to find all sub-events. Please add P108i
Why use both EX_Association and P9_consists_of sub-event? Just put P2_has_type into the sub-event, don't use EX_Association
Take "produced by Workshop of Rembrandt".