Primer References

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
GraphDB Documentation
This documentation is NOT for the latest version of GraphDB.

Latest version - GraphDB 7.1

Next versions

GraphDB 6.5
GraphBD 6.6
GraphBD 7.0
GraphDB 7.1

Previous versions

GraphDB 6.3
GraphDB 6.2
GraphDB 6.0 & 6.1

OWLIM 5.4
OWLIM 5.3
OWLIM 5.2
OWLIM 5.1
OWLIM 5.0
OWLIM 4.4
OWLIM 4.3
OWLIM 4.2
OWLIM 4.1
OWLIM 4.0

  1. Bergmann, F.Introduction to Description Logics. Web page, http://www.fraber.de/sitec/dl.html
  2. Box, D; Ehnebuske, D; Kakivaya, G; Layman, A; Mendelsohn, N; Nielsen, H F; Thatte, S; Winer, D.Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1, W3C note, World Wide Web Consortium, May 2000 http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/
  3. Brickley, D., Guha, R.V; (eds.). Resource Description Framework(RDF) Schemas, W3C
    http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/
  4. Broekstra, J. Storage, Querying and Inferencing for Semantic WebLanguages. Ph.D. thesis, SIKS Dissertation Series No. 2005-09, ISBN 90 9019 2360, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. 2005. download the thesis
  5. Broekstra, J; Kampman, A; van Harmelen, F. Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema.International Semantic WebConference, Sardinia, Italy, 2002.
  6. Carroll, J J; Bizer, C; Hayes, P; Stickler, P.Named Graphs, Provenance and Trust. International Semantic Web Conference, Hiroshima, Japan, 2004.
  7. Carroll, J. J; De Roo, J.OWLWeb Ontology Language: Test Cases. W3C Recommendation 10 Feb. 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/
  8. Dean, M; Schreiber, G; (eds.); Bechhofer, S; van Harmelen, F; Hendler, J; Horrocks, I; McGuinness, D L; Patel-Schneider, P F; Stein, L A.OWLWeb Ontology Language Reference. _W3C Recommendation_. 10 Feb. 2004.
    http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/
  9. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1. http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/
  10. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1: Reference Description. http://dublincore.org/documents/2003/06/02/dces/
  11. Ehrig, M; Haase, P; Hefke, M; Stojanovic, N. Similarity for ontologies – a Comprehensive Framework. Proc. 13th European Conference on Information Systems, May 2005.
  12. Grosof, B; Horrocks, I; Volz, R; Decker, S. Description LogicPrograms: Combining Logic Programs with Description Logic. In Proc. of WWW2003, Budapest, May 2003.
  13. Gruber, T R. A translation approach to portable ontologies.Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220, 1993.
    http://ksl-web.stanford.edu/KSL_Abstracts/KSL-92-71.html
  14. Gruber, T R. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. Presented at the Padua workshop on Formal Ontology. March 1993, later published in _International Journal of Human-Computer Studies_, Vol. 43, Issues 4-5, Nov. 1995, pp. 907-928. 
    http://tomgruber.org/writing/onto-design.htm
  15. Guarino, N; Giaretta, P. Ontologies and Knowledge Bases: Towards a Terminological Clarification. In N. Mars (ed.) Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing. IOS Press, Amsterdam: pp. 25-32. 1995
  16. Guarino, N. Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of FOIS'98, Trento, Italy, June 6-8, 1998. Amsterdam, IOS Press. pdf
  17. Hayes, P. RDF Model Theory. Working draft, World Wide Web Consortium. September 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/
  18. Hayes, P. RDF Semantics. W3C Recommendation. Feb. 10, 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-mt-20040210/
  19. Hillmann, D.; Using Dublin Core; DCMI Recommended Resource. Nov. 7, 2005
  20. Horrocks, I. Patel-Schneider, P F, Bechhofer, S, Tsarkov, D. OWLRules: A Proposal and Prototype Implementation. Journal of Web Semantics, 3 (2005), pp. 23-40.
  21. ISO. Information Technology-Database Language SQL. Standard No. ISO/IEC 9075:1999, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 1999. (Available from American National Standards Institute, New York, NY 10036, (212) 642-4900.).
  22. KIM. Home page, http://www.ontotext.com/kim
  23. Kiryakov, A. Ontologies for Knowledge Management, Chapter 7 in: Davies, J; Studer, R; Warren, P. (eds.). Semantic WebTechnologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems. Wiley, UK, 2006.
  24. Klyne, G; Carrol , J. J; (eds). (2004).Resource Description Framework(RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation 10 Feb. 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
  25. Motik, B; Sattler, U; Studer R.Query Answering for OWL-DLwith Rules. Journal of Web Semantics, issue 3 (2005), pp. 41-60.
  26. Named Graphs. W3C Overview. http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/
  27. Ontology Logic and Reasoning at Semantic Karlsruhe. Home page, http://logic.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/
  28. OWLIM – Pragmatic OWL Semantic Repository. Presentation slides, Ontotext AD, 2008 http://www.ontotext.com/owlim/OWLIMPres.pdf
  29. OWLIM Tests and Benchmarks. Ontotext Lab. 2007. http://www.ontotext.com/owlim/v2.9.0/doc/OWLIMTest.pdf
  30. Popov, B; Kiryakov, A; Kirilov, A; Manov, D; Ognyanoff, D; Goranov, M. KIM – Semantic Annotation Platform. In The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003, Sanibel Island, USA, 2003.
  31. PROTON Ontology (PROTo Ontology). Home page. http://proton.semanticweb.org/
  32. RDF Primer. In W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/
  33. RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised). In W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
  34. Resource Description Framework(RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax, section Graph Data Model. In W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-data-model
  35. Semantic Knowledge Technologies (SEKT). Home page. http://www.sekt-project.com/
  36. SWAD-Europe Workshop on Semantic Web Storage and Retrieval. Amsterdam, Holland, November 2003. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/dev_workshop_report_4/#owl-tiny.
  37. ter Horst, H J. Combining RDF and Part of OWLwith Rules: Semantics, Decidability, Complexity. In Proc. of ISWC 2005, Galway, Ireland, Nov. 6-10, 2005. LNCS 3729, pp. 668-684.
  38. Terziev, I; Kiryakov, A.PROTo ONtology: A Base Upper-Level Ontology for the Semantic Web, SEKT Q4 Meeting. Innsbruck, Austria., Jan. 17-19, 2005. http://proton.semanticweb.org/PROTON.ppt
  39. TRREE – Triple Reasoning and Rule Entailment Engine. Home page. http://ontotext.com/trree/
  40. Uniform Resource Identifier, Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI
  41. User Guide of Sesame. Aduna b. v. http://openrdf.callimachus.net/sesame/2.7/docs/users.docbook?view
  42. T.D. Wang, B. Parsia, and J. Hendler. A survey of the web ontology landscape. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4273:682, 2006.
  43. Hitzler, Pascal; Krötzsch, Markus; Parsia, Bijan; Patel-Schneider, Peter F.; Rudolph, Sebastian (27 October 2009). "OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer". OWL 2 Web Ontology Language. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-primer-20091027/
  44. Motik, Boris; Cuenca Grau, Bernardo; Horrocks, Ian; Wu, Zhe; Fokoue, Achille; Lutz, Carsten (27 October 2009) "OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Profiles". OWL 2 Web Ontology Language. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/
  45. Carroll, Jeremy; Herman, Ivan; Patel-Schneider, Peter F. (27 October 2009) "OWL 2 Web Ontology Language RDF-Based Semantics". OWL 2 Web Ontology Language. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-rdf-based-semantics/
  46. ter Horst, Herman J. (2005) "Completeness, decidability and complexity of entailment for RDF Schema and a semantic extension involving the OWL vocabulary". Journal of Web Semantics 3(2-3):79-115, 2005
  47. Patel-Schneider, Peter F.; Hayes, Patrick; Horrocks, Ian (10 February 2004) "OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax". W3C Recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/
Labels:
None
Enter labels to add to this page:
Please wait 
Looking for a label? Just start typing.